Meta-morphosis: How FF MetaPlus Became FF Meta

When we see the expansive superfamily that FF Meta has become, it’s hard to believe its beginnings were so humble. As the family has known three different incarnations, there tends to be some confusion about which version is which. So let’s clear the air and explore the history of the most successful humanist sans of the previous decade, “the Helvetica of the nineties”.


FF Meta 1 1991

Originally, back in 1991 when the second batch of FontFonts was released, there was FF Meta (Normal, Bold, Small Caps). One of the defining characteristics of FF Meta — and FontFonts in general — was the presence of hanging (or oldstyle) figures and additional ff-ligatures in the “regular” Normal and Bold weights, while lining figures were found in the Small Caps weight. The distinctive Meta arrow occupied the slots for the lesser-than and greater-than symbols.

FF Meta 2 1992

The first expansion came in 1992 with FF Meta 2, adding three more weights (Italic, Italic Small Caps, Bold Small Caps).

FF MetaPlus 1993

FF MetaPlus (not “Meta Plus” as it’s often mistyped), released in 1993, was the big leap forward. It introduced three new weights — which effectively tripled the number of fonts to 18 — and included a fine-tuning of some characters (most notably a correction of the crossbar on the lc ‘t’) and revisions of spacing and kerning. The family at that point featured Normal, Book, Medium, Bold and Black weights, all in Roman, Italic, Small Caps and Italic Small Caps (except for the Black weight which didn’t include Small Caps). Still hanging figures in the ‘regular’ weights and lining figures in the Small Caps. The latter featured the Meta arrow, while lesser-than and greater-than symbols were added to the “regular” fonts.

FF Meta 1998

Eventually, in 1998 it was back to FF Meta. This saw a reorganisation of the family into subfamilies: FF Meta Normal, FF Meta Book, FF Meta Medium, FF Meta Bold and FF Meta Black, all in Roman, Italic, Small Caps and Italic Small Caps, which all got coupled with their respective Expert and Lining Figures weights: yep, a whopping 60 fonts indeed. Biggest change this time was the addition of the Black Small Caps, and moving of the extra ligatures (ff, ffi, ffl which were previously in the “regular” fonts) to the new Expert fonts. And of course the Lining figures weights meant that you don’t have to switch between “regular” fonts and Small Caps fonts anymore to get the desired type of numerals.

Of course the story doesn’t end there, as the latest — and definitive — incarnation of FF Meta got subsequently expanded with foreign language versions, a Condensed family, additional light weights (Light, Hairline, and Thin) and just recently a group of Headline cuts.

So, to conclude — never mix the original six weight FF Meta with FF MetaPlus nor the new FF Meta family, as it has different spacing and kerning, and some redesigned characters. Substituting FF Meta for FF MetaPlus is recommended, but keep in mind that ff-ligatures will disappear and types of numerals might differ.

[ Editor’s note: If you’re stuck with old FF MetaPlus, there is a free upgrade path (minus a small handling charge) to FF Meta. Just have your proof-of-purchase handy and give us a ring. If you are involved in any sort of document collaboration we highly advise upgrading for two big reasons: 1. Using the most current font data consistently across your workflow is always best. 2. FontShop cannot guarantee the availability of FF MetaPlus in the future. — Stephen ]

ShareThis

8 Comments:

  1. Actually, Yves, I think that the Helvetica of the 90s was Helvetica ;-D

    Posted by Dan Reynolds on Oct. 6, 2005
  2. Dan, Helvetica is the Helvetica of the noughties (graphic designers in other words…)

    Posted by Tom on Nov. 16, 2005
  3. Hmmmmm all good, but to answer Dan Reynolds, Helvetica is NOT a font of the nineties - never was. And although Meta was designed in the nineties, it was not used effectively until 2001 and beyond. So Meta could be called the font of the new millennium rather than compare it to boring old Helvetica.
    Xandro.

    Posted by Xandro on Dec. 17, 2006
  4. Then the helvetica of the 2000s is FF DIN!

    Posted by Andy on Apr. 24, 2008
  5. i just love meta. simple.

    Posted by nora hussayni on Sep. 25, 2008
  6. It’s funny how your perceptions change, isn’t it. When I first saw that wiggly “l” I didn’t like it at all (oldschool hasbeen) but one by one I chucked out all my unexamined assumptions about letterforms. Pity my employer doesn’t feel the same way… I had a bit of a fight over the purchase of Meta. (We’re stuck with a Linotype CD collection, which has lots of good, old fonts but a whole lot of crap as well. Nothing from the Nineties let alone the noughies!)

    I salivate when I see some of the brilliant modern fonts being released by FontShop. I’m the poor child staring into the sweetshop window. I’ve got to get fonts past I.T. as well as the bean counters.

    Sigh.

    Posted by Intaglio on Oct. 3, 2008
  7. I’m commenting a little late (just over 4 years) but I think this face is as fresh as it was 16 years ago.

    Posted by Nick on Oct. 9, 2009
  8. Dontchaworry, you’re still well within the five year grace period for very late comments. ;)

    Posted by Yves Peters on Oct. 10, 2009

Post a comment:

  •  

The FontFeed

The FontFeed is a daily dispatch of recommended fonts, typography techniques, and inspirational examples of digital type at work in the real world. Eat up.

Archives

Subscribe

The FontFeed RSS The FontFeed Comments RSS

Close
Powered by ShareThis